What’s also becoming evident in the ongoing 12/31/2025 valuation cycle is the role of AI in shaping valuation discussions.
Not in a theoretical way—but in very practical terms.
Auditors are starting to ask:
- Are projections still valid in light of AI disruption?
- Could margins compress faster than expected?
- Is this company an AI beneficiary—or at risk?
For some portfolio companies, AI is a tailwind. For others, it introduces real uncertainty. Either way, ignoring it is no longer an option.
A Shift Toward More Thoughtful Valuations
As a result, many funds are moving toward more dynamic approaches:
- Updating assumptions more frequently
- Using scenario-based methods where outcomes are uncertain
- Bringing in market data more deliberately
- Spending more time documenting the “why” behind the numbers
It’s a shift from static marking to active valuation.
What This Means Going Forward
The direction is pretty clear.
- Cost is still relevant—but only as a starting point
- Last round pricing still matters—but it’s not the answer on its own
- And valuation is becoming less about convenience—and more about credibility
Funds that adapt to this shift are not just better prepared for audits—they also have a clearer view of their own portfolios.
Because at the end of the day, valuation isn’t just about reporting.
It’s about understanding what your investments are really worth—today.


